Renders Show Reimagined 1st & Alameda
Metro
The Regional Connector’s subway alignment would emerge at 1st & Alameda, creating a Y-connection with existing tracks.
DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES — Renderings presented by Metro at recent meetings show potentially huge changes for the corner of 1st & Alameda. Three layers of action could see north-south traffic bypassing the intersection from below, while fanciful elevated sidewalks would send pedestrians above the cars and trains below.
The renders are part of Metro’s Alternatives Analysis study for the Regional Connector project. Metro has been working on options for connecting the potentially below-grade Connector with the above-grade Gold Line Eastside Extension, currently finishing construction.
The Regional Connector would bring together the Blue and Expo lines, currently dead-ended at 7th & Figueroa, with the Gold Line's Little Tokyo / Arts District station. The $650 - $800 million project would allow trains to run throughout the system, creating lines from Pasadena to Long Beach and East L.A. to Culver City. The Connector is expected to carry 48 trains per hour during peak periods.
A subway version of the Connector is one of two alignments receiving further study, but a connection to the Gold Line would still need to occur at-grade because of choices made in that line's design.
While concern about traffic impacts has been expressed throughout the Connector outreach process, impacts at 1st & Alameda would be especially severe. The diagonal nature of the crossing would mean the both east-west and north-south traffic would be blocked at the same time. With a train expected every 90 seconds, mitigation measures would be required to keep cars and trains from disrupting each other.
The plans shown in these renders would have four lanes of Alameda use an underpass to bypass 1st street and the train crossings. This is especially targeted toward the truck traffic that uses Alameda.
Additionally, some renders show a pair of elevated sidewalks meeting in the middle of the intersection and allowing pedestrians to cross tracks and streets uninhibited.
In order to accommodate the portal that would be needed to transition the Connector from subway to above-ground, Metro would propose to take the block currently occupied by Office Depot via eminent domain. The site would provide construction staging, and would be available for a mixed-use development once work is completed.
Those interested in hearing Metro's presentation on the project can attend the Little Tokyo Community Council's general meeting tomorrow, May 20th, at 11:45am.
Thanks to Ron for sending the renders blogdowntown's way.
Metro
To mitigate concerns regarding the volume of truck traffic on Alameda, the north-south roadway would be dropped to create an underpass.
Metro
Metro’s renders for the corner show new development on the existing Office Depot lot, along with fanciful overpasses for pedestrians.
Regional Connector
Renders Show Reimagined 1st & Alameda
May 19, 2008Renderings presented by Metro at recent meetings show potentially huge changes for the corner of 1st & Alameda. Three layers of action could see north...
Regional Connector Down to Two Alternatives
May 07, 2008Planning for the Regional Connector is down to two preferred alternatives, one above ground and one below. Costs for the two differ by only $150 million...
Comments
Thanks to you and Ron for the renderings. Now I can see clearly how this is supposed to work. Yep, Office Depot is gone, which is no great loss (although I do find the place handy). I wonder if it is possible for the restaurants along Central on that block to survive during construction. Hmm, I'm not encouraged. But, the long-term improvement would certainly be worth it.
I do also wonder if Second Street would continue to thrive as a retail and restaurant corridor during the construction period. Doubtless it would rebound in the aftermath. Such is life.
# on May.19.2008 AT 10:28 PMSecond Street would be largely unaffected because the square block that contains the Office Depot would be the place where the train emerges from underground. The tunnels are built with a boring machine, so the street can remain as is. You would see disruption only where the stations get built, because the ground would have to be opened there.
The intersection of 1st and Alameda would be a mess for a while, however.
# on May.19.2008 AT 10:53 PMPersonally, I think the subway option would likely bring little disruption to the real core of 2nd street (San Pedro to Alameda). Having the big portal site should mean zero cut-and-cover on 2nd itself, just boring underneath it. While the Red Line boring had plenty of issues, the state of the art has come a long way since then, and the Gold Line Eastside Extension work has gone really well.
2nd would have more severe construction impacts in the Historic Core, where they would do the cut-and-cover for the station there. Even that would mostly just be dust and ugliness; the concrete they cover those sites with now is far better than the wooden beams they were using in the Red Line days.
# on May.19.2008 AT 10:53 PMSimply REPLACE the (newly built) J-Town station with an underground station as part of a sunken Y at the intersection. The track transitioning from the Pasadena line to the East L.A. line would remain at grade. A portal to grade running to East L.A. could emerge in the center of First Street east of Alameda. A portal to grade running to Union Station/Pasadena could emerge on the east side of Alameda north of First.
Instead of condemning the Office Depot/Atomic Cafe buildings, instead condemn the other structure to the north of Office Depot. That is where you would have construction access. Moreover, with an underground Y, you could utilize the unbuilt parcel at the northeast corner for access and storage space. And stabilize the ground beneath whatever structures that would remain above twin-bores extending from Second and Japanese Village Ped Crossing running directly towards First & Alameda.
Pursuing the ideas presented in the above schematics, you have the cost of depressing Alameda beneath First as well as condemnation of most of the Office Depot block plus additional lineal foot of track running south of the Related residential block, not to mention the cost of the far out pedestrian overpasses which require lengthy ramps and elevators and what's to prevent pedestrians from chancing it in front of oncoming trains, just like auto drivers along the Blue Line have chanced it and been creamed to smithereens.
Replace the J-Town station with something more imaginative, under ground.
# on May.19.2008 AT 11:04 PMI second Juanito's idea. Move the construction action to where it is less disruptive.
# on May.19.2008 AT 11:14 PMActually, in the first rendering, it looks like the former Atomic Cafe / current Senor Fish building wouldn't be touched at all. That's shown as a blank spot on the rendering, but that 100+ year old one-story brick bldg. is definitely there. In this rendering, it would remain. The small buildings holding Starbucks etc. also would remain, as the first picture shows.
However, the last rendering shows giant crosswalks and some giant Wal-Mart like structure taking up the entire block, so I can't really tell just WHAT they are proposing to do, apart from building a train portal.
# on May.19.2008 AT 11:40 PMJuanito: Metro has said that the portal in the middle of 1st (toward East L.A.) would require widening 1st street and taking land from the Buddhist Temple on 1st. It would also require taking the eastside Gold Line out of service for an extended period of time, right after it opens. Politically, both of those are probably non-starters.
That's the sort of thing that should have been properly considered ahead of time, but it seems things never quite happen that way.
# on May.20.2008 AT 12:01 AMCompense the temple by condeming land to the west of their parking lot. Reconfigure the parking lot so that there can be space for a classic Japanese landscape between the lot and the temple. Widen First Street. Replace the existing garden landscape south of the temple with high granite boulders and wrought iron fencing/gates. Abandon Banning Street for two blocks east of Alameda. Future private development should include extending Hewitt from First up to Temple Street. The parcel at the northeast corner of First & Alameda would have frontage/access only on First and on Hewitt streets. The owner would be given the abandoned section of Banning Street to compense for whatever setback required along the north side of First.
Whatever solution for keeping the Gold Line operational should prevail over automotive/truck traffic. Eliminate street parking on Vignes for duration of construction (Temple and Second as alternate routes). And there could be three eight hour work shifts to speed the process.
Make those very select granite boulders. Much less costly than condemning Office Depot.
Voila!
# on May.20.2008 AT 01:10 AMOverall, I really, really like this plan as a below grade subway. Even before I heard about this connector proposal, I thought it was odd that the gold line from East LA abruptly turned north towards Union Station and away from downtown.
I hope this can be built relatively quickly.
# on May.20.2008 AT 08:50 AMJuanito, Is there such a thing as an Underground Wye?
In many track diagrams and layouts they are always two levels to eliminate two trains blindly colliding with each other. At least with at-grade and elevated the operators can visually see where the train is crossing in it's tracks so there's better reaction time.
So they would have to go even deeper to create the connections that are needed and that would still require the demolition of not only one site but TWO sites to add the two portals, First Street widening and underground wye but you'd still have to close off the 1st/Alameda intersection to build it.
# on May.20.2008 AT 09:17 AMYep, jus like Wilshire/Vermont.
Let's do it.
And let's hope the Related Companies walks away from The Grand Avenue scheme. Then there can be a Connector station right at the top of Bunker Hill. The county could then take over and begin solving it's infrastructure problem, build new admin and courthouse structures. It's present two buildings could be replaced with office, residential and retail. THAT would activate the mall.
And if the owner of the World Trade Center were able to buy some unused air rights from the Convention Center, he'd be sitting on a gold mine with a Connector station at Flower and Fourth. Then we might get a REAL World Trade Center.
# on May.20.2008 AT 10:01 AMBART uses an underground Wye in downtown Oakland. It is a large, multi-level thing, and the most important connection in thw whole system.
# on May.20.2008 AT 10:03 AMWhatever solution for keeping the Gold Line operational should prevail over automotive/truck traffic. Eliminate street parking on Vignes for duration of construction (Temple and Second as alternate routes). And there could be three eight hour work shifts to speed the process.
That is a good point and that is something I thought about too and that is one of the main reasons why the at-grade First Street crossing is do-able because there are parallel streets that one block away that can take the extra traffic that would have used First Street.
Much less costly than condemning Office Depot.
I would disagree because in the long run they can develop the entire lot after the Connector is operational even bring Office Depot back in with offices and residences above it and generate a consistent source of revenue from the dense mixed-use development.
# on May.20.2008 AT 10:10 AMCrack the whip, Jerard!
Tell your bosses to MOVE on this. We need the subway option and we need it now.
# on May.20.2008 AT 11:25 AMJuanito, My boss would be me. I don't work for Metro on this project but my skill is Construction Management, Architecture and Urban Planning/Design so it's that hat from which I'm speaking from.
I do know Ginny would love to hear those other suggestions since her boss is working on the outreach for this project.
# on May.20.2008 AT 11:39 AMI think the two-level underground portal is best. Metro could build it on the north east corner of 1st and Alameda, that way it does not disrupt traffic during construction and you can build on top of it when it is done.
A second alternative would be to dead en 1st street at Alameda (East/West) and put North South Alameda underground. I think this scenario avoids some of the hazards of having any car traffic mixed with trains switching directions.
# on Jul.22.2008 AT 05:18 PMIf you do the Y connection above ground, wouldn't you need to build a second station above ground and how would you let people switch from one station to the other seamlessly when transferring?
# on Jul.22.2008 AT 05:20 PM


The Nickel Diner Opens...
Downtown Lens: Beautiful...
The Nickel Diner Opens...
The Nickel Diner Opens...
EveryBlock Adds L.A...
EveryBlock Adds L.A...
The Nickel Diner Opens...
New Plan Just a New...
The Nickel Diner Opens...
Trip to San Diego Shows...