Support verbdowntown

City Proposes to Pick Up the Tab for Dodger Transit

By Eric Richardson
Published: Sunday, June 22, 2008, at 04:38PM

Dodger Parking Lots Eric Richardson [Flickr]

Cars enter Dodger Stadium through the Academy Dr. gate in this file photo from May, 2007.

The Times today includes a story saying that the city and the Dodgers have reached an agreement for providing transit into Dodger Stadium for the remainder of the 2008 season. Buses would run from Union Station starting on July 25th, the first home game after the All-Star break. The city would pick up the $70,000 cost of running the service, while the Dodgers would handle advertising.

A June 2nd DOT memo on the subject (PDF) sheds more light on the proposed service. Buses would start running 90 minutes before game time, with a five bus fleet providing for approximately eight minute headways (the time between buses). Service would likely be free, and would be contracted out to a charter bus operator.

The proposed route would run service from Union Station’s Transit Plaza west on Cesar Chavez, with stops at Figueroa street and Marion avenue to connect to Metro bus service. The buses would enter the stadium via Elysian Park avenue and loop around the stadium the the Transit Plaza located behind center field. Return service would be via the same route.

Initial discussions of the stadium shuttle focused on the city’s inability to pay for the service given its transit budget deficits, but the final proposal has the city doing exactly that. The June 2nd memo says that “the Dodgers have indicated that they are not interested in sharing the cost to operate the shuttle service.” An attached memo cites the team’s stance that the service should be publicly funded, given the amount of money the team has put into stadium renovations. The cost to run a full season of service would have been $170,000, though the DOT memo suggests that up to $90,000 could be recouped through exterior advertising.

The city would create the service under its Charter Bus Program, and the memo points to Transit Systems as a likely operator. The program and operator are the same as was used for the shuttle service required to access Griffith Observatory after its reopened.

Though many Observatory visitors were unhappy with the shuttle buses, they provide an interesting perk for this service. The DOT suggests running the service for free, citing the lack of fare boxes on the charter buses.

While the original motion asked for transit to both Dodger Stadium and Elysian Park, the current proposal deals exclusively with game-day stadium transit.

The proposal now goes to the City Council’s Transportation Committee, and is agendized for Wednesday afternoon’s meeting.

PREVIOUSLY: Buses, Baseball and Parks: Discussing Transit for Dodger Stadium and Elysian Park


Related:



This story belongs to the following topics:

Topic:
Dodger Trolley

7 stories



Comments

1
monk Turner writes:

Amen.

# on Jun.22.2008 AT 05:56 PM
2
Bert Green writes:

The Dodgers say that “the service should be publicly funded, given the amount of money the team has put into stadium renovations”

Um, how is that a public benefit? The stadium is not a public place. It is a private business. They upgrade their own property and that is a reason why the public should pay for the buses?

I am all for better public transit but this is about favoring one business, the multi-millionaire Dodgers. Give me a break.

# on Jun.22.2008 AT 06:37 PM
3
Ray Dang writes:

Wouldn’t a service like this be much more effective from Chinatown station? I mean it’s 1/4th of the distance which would allow for shorter headways.

# on Jun.22.2008 AT 06:46 PM
4
Eric Richardson writes:

Ray: The raw distance isn’t really that much different, and running out of the Chinatown station limits the number of transfer opportunities you’ve got. Forcing Red Line / Amtrak / Metrolink passengers into a one station Gold Line connection ends up increasing the time and cost of taking the shuttle.

# on Jun.22.2008 AT 06:58 PM
5
Dodgers Fumble writes:

A Dodger DASH shuttle should not be publicly funded.

Furthermore, the organization’s management is missing a positive public relations opportunity by not volunteering to fund this shuttle. A “Dodgers to provide Union Station shuttle” headline would be worth 10x the operating cost of the project – especially given the increased ticket prices and parking rates that aggravated fans not too long ago.

Incidentally, how often does the stadium’s parking operation gets audited for compliance with the City’s Parking Occupancy Tax? In tough municipal financial times like the ones the City has self-declared, the Dodgers may have just shot themselves in the foot as a POT audit could uncover much more than the cost of a shuttle.

Let’s hope City Council goes after this one with the same zeal it did a similar amount to be spent on improving Pershing Square.

# on Jun.22.2008 AT 09:07 PM
6
Dennis Smith writes:

As I understand it, the Dodgers have complete control over their parking facilities and share none of their parking revenue with the City or County of Los Angeles. This was part of the sweetheart deal awarded to Walter O’Malley that gave him total ownership of the 350 acres in Chavez Ravine and was approved by voters back in 1958. Historically the Dodgers have been resistant to tying the stadium into a regional mass transit system as it might cut into that lucrative revenue stream.

To be honest, Walter O’Malley had a stadium easily accessed by mass transit, the famed Ebbetts Field in a borough called Brooklyn once so crisscrossed by streetcar tracks that its inhabitants were known as “trolley dodgers”. It was Walter O’Malley who moved baseball away from the urban neighborhoods and began the exodus to suburban ballparks, surrounded by parking lots and entered from a freeway offramp. Many of the new stadiums built in the last decade have sought to return baseball to its urban roots and are seen as a way to reinvigorate city neighborhoods. However. Dodger Stadium remains on its acropolis, overlooking the city yet somehow removed from it at the same time. The present ownership, under Frank McCourt, a man who certainly understands the value of a parking lot, will do little to change this in the near future.

# on Jun.22.2008 AT 11:07 PM
7
Rich Alossi writes:

Hooray for transit to Dodger Stadium. Boo for making the City pick up the tab.

Also, I know it’s probably better than having the equivalent number of cars on the road, but those Transit System buses are the lowest of the low in terms of emissions standards.

If you’ve been on Highland Boulevard during a Bowl performance, you’ve probably seen the exhaust those white buses belch. It also angers me that the buses sit on Ventura Boulevard idling for hours. They’ll probably be sitting in Chinatown idling for hours during Dodger games now.

# on Jun.22.2008 AT 11:12 PM
8
Ed Fuentes writes:

The Dodgers contribution to market the shuttle is a rather fuzzy promise. Does that mean they will pony up and buy a wrap around the bus, or just mention it on the air once in a while?

Already, the LAT headlines the spin that the Dodgers are part of the solution.

No wonder Frank McCourt is “thrilled.”

# on Jun.23.2008 AT 03:47 AM
9
Eric Richardson writes:

Rich: I thought the same thing on emissions, but according to the Transit Systems website, all of their buses use biodiesel. Supposedly that really cuts down on the harmful stuff in the emissions.

Ed: The memo mentions wrapping the buses.

# on Jun.23.2008 AT 08:14 AM
10
Parking Occupancy Tax writes:

The Parking Occupancy Tax is that 10% tax all parking lot operators in Los Angeles must collect and pay to the City of Los Angeles.

If the Dodgers have had a waiver on that tax for the last 50 years then they should never cry poor again.

# on Jun.23.2008 AT 09:12 AM
11
iluvhatemail writes:

This is an outrage!!

Not really, but why couldnt the stupid Dodgers just increase ticket price by $.50 or so to offset the costs? Why should my tax dollars go to supporting a sport I can’t stand? I say bulldoze the entire baseball field and put a public park up there instead.

# on Jun.23.2008 AT 09:14 AM
12
LAofAnaheim writes:

How about, if we the fans, pay $.50 or $1 to use the shuttle? That should cover the $70K cost for the year.

# on Jun.23.2008 AT 11:04 AM
13
Rich Alossi writes:

Oh, thanks for looking into the pollution issue, Eric! I had no idea they were biodiesel. So even though they’re carbon-neutral… I still wish they’d put some soot traps on them.

# on Jun.23.2008 AT 04:57 PM
14
tornadoes28 writes:

My opinion on the Dodger’s proposed 500 million dollar development around the stadium. It sucks.

It may be a nice parklike setting that people love to visit. But Dodger stadium is still a remote outpost that will never truly be conected to downtwon. So putting 500 million dollars worth of development up there makes no sense. I really don’t see that too many people will want to visit there when there is no game or other event taking place so it seems like a waste of money.

# on Jun.24.2008 AT 12:41 PM

Add Your Comment:

YOUR INFORMATION:
Name:
Email:
URL:
CONNECT:

Use your Facebook account to log in to blogdowntown and get share comments and stories straight to your social network!

Don't use Facebook but want us to remember your information? Create a blogdowntown account or log in to your account.


COMMENT GUIDELINES:
Keep it civil, everyone. If you're attacking people instead of arguments, or being overly profane, expect your comment to get deleted.
Comments should be on the topic of the post or they will be removed.
Use the live preview below to see how your comment will look before posting.

COMMENT:
FORMATTING BASICS:

blogdowntown uses Markdown formatting.

_Italics_
__Bold__
<http://url.to.link>
[link text](http://url)

PREVIEW:

Start typing...