"Buildings are meant to be experienced"
DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES — I have to thank Franklin Ave. for linking to Mitch Glaser’s interesting Paradox Unbound blog about city planning. In a post from Monday he comments on the Downtown News’ ”From ‘Deathstar’ to Screen Star.” He makes a point that I think is hugely important:
I think it’s problematic to judge a building on its artistic merits over its relevance to its urban context. Buildings are meant to be experienced, not portrayed.
As I posted last July, though, Thom Mayne doesn’t necessarily agree.
Mayne’s answer surprised the interviewer for Metropolis. The average person’s understanding of his projects is “irrelevant,” he told me. “There’s layers and layers of ideas that go into a piece of work.
Mitch also mentions the very cool looking Screening the City film series that James Rojas is putting on in Chinatown. Hopefully next month’s DLANC Board meeting will run a little shorter and I’ll be able to make it over.
Comments
Thom Mayne is another one of these arrogant architects that really have no clue as to how to relate to people. As an architect I could see many opportunities to allow some interaction with pedestrians.
It’s true that a building is meant to be experienced, but how can anyone experience something if there’s no possible opportunity to enter the building. It’s like having a conversation witho someone with neither side talking. If you want to talk about an experience enter into the Bonaventure Hotel. Similar in it’s dead blank wall modernist form but at the very least there are visable things from the outside that will allow a form of curiosity that will invoke someone to enter the building. And once you’re inside it becomes a different experience completely.
With the Caltrans Deathstar there’s no opportunity to inform and educate the public with it’s green design. The site is sloped differently on 3 of those 4 sides allowing a subtle opportunity to have some small resturants or stores to serve nearby Little Tokyo. Imagine had they had those same panels or adjustable solar shades on the ground floor with the top of the parking structure be a ground floor garden and additional “green roof”.
But that design wouldn’t work because I’m thinking like a human first rather than an architect.
I want to thank you (somewhat belatedly) for reading what I wrote and sharing it with your readers. I did enjoy the first installment of “Screening the City” but I hope James gets his hands on a more reliable DVD player before next month!




Hotel Cecil Applies...
A Resolution for Restaurants...
A Resolution for Restaurants...
The End of Painted Ads...
A Resolution for Restaurants...
A Resolution for Restaurants...
A Resolution for Restaurants...
Hotel Cecil Applies...
Did You Know: Hotel...
L.A. Live: Not Quite...